On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 07:24:48AM -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote: > dm-block-manager: use spinlocks that don't disable interrupts > > This will never be called in an interrupt context, so we don't have to use > spinlocks that disable interrupts. The code looks like a re-implementation of rw_semaphores to me. Is there any good reason to do this? (hint: normally there isn't :)) -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
