Re: dm: Integrity errors should not cause failover

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 18 2011 at 12:49am -0400,
Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> Integrity errors need to be passed to the owner of the integrity
> metadata for processing. Consequently EILSEQ should be passed up the
> stack.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> ---
> 
> Ping on this one?

It has been on my personal queue but I didn't push the issue with
Alasdair (for 2.6.39).

At this point seems we should be targetting this fix for 2.6.40 but I'll
defer to Alasdair on whether he'd like to push to .39 last minute.

> diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c b/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c
> index a550a05..aa4e570 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c
> @@ -1290,7 +1290,7 @@ static int do_end_io(struct multipath *m, struct request *clone,
>  	if (!error && !clone->errors)
>  		return 0;	/* I/O complete */
>  
> -	if (error == -EOPNOTSUPP || error == -EREMOTEIO)
> +	if (error == -EOPNOTSUPP || error == -EREMOTEIO || error == -EILSEQ)
>  		return error;
>  
>  	if (mpio->pgpath)

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel


[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux