On 4/28/11 5:59 PM, Alasdair G Kergon wrote: > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 04:28:17PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> I still think that concats of floppies, usb disks, and ssds should be rare, so I'm less concerned about that ;) > > It's the 'undefined' cases that cause us the trouble though: we do have > to return something and I prefer to work with defined and documented > behaviour, rather than pretending something is 'undefined' or > 'unimportant' and later finding people relied on its actual behaviour. If you are saying that a target should return EOPNOTSUPP when it does not support the operation, then we are in violent agreement. :) -Eric > Alasdair -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
