>>>>> "Mike" == Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> Yeah, that'll come as part of my DIX1.1 patch set. Mike> Seems my concern should be fixed independent of a larger update Mike> patchset. Unless DIX isn't meaningful for "stable" kernels Mike> without your full DIX1.1 update? Well, I'm not aware of any shipping non-512 byte block DIF devices other than scsi_debug. And it's not good enough to just fix it in DM since this is a hardware parameter that needs to be queried and bubbled up. It can't be scaled like the rest of the topology block sizes, it's wired in the hardware. So I just don't see much point in trying to fix it now when any ties to the logical block size will be severed in my impending patch set. -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
