On Tue, 2011-03-08 at 10:14 -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote: > On Tue, Mar 08 2011 at 1:54am -0500, > Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > Integrity errors need to be passed to the owner of the integrity > > metadata for processing. Consequently EILSEQ should be passed up the > > stack. > > > > Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Acked-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Thanks Martin. But James has already staged a few patches associated > with IO error differentation for 2.6.39. Your dm-mpath patch will need > to be rebased on that work; best to feed it to James too. > > (we were gambling that there wouldn't be additional DM or block changes > related to this work and figured it safe to have James carry all the > SCSI, block and DM changes... ;) > > Problem is I'm not seeing a 2.6.39 branch in James' scsi-2.6-misc.git > (even though I know the changes are staged there ;) > > See: > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jejb/scsi-misc-2.6.git;a=commit;h=79775567e0439ca47eb9f501e52c4b713d44cf89 > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jejb/scsi-misc-2.6.git;a=commit;h=751b2a7d623ead9e55f751a6087efeab454b5659 > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jejb/scsi-misc-2.6.git;a=commit;h=63583cca745f440167bf27877182dc13e19d4bcf > > James, > Any easy way to get Martin your 2.6.39 tree? Do you have a branch (just > the tag isn't exposed)? Branch for what? It's a linear tree with all the SCSI patches on master. James -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
