>>>>> "Mike" == Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: Mike> So it seems we need to establish bi->sector_size during the final Mike> stage of blk_integrity_register(), e.g. when a template is passed. Mike> Not sure if you'd agree with that change in general but it'll work Mike> for DM because the queue_limits are established before Mike> dm_table_set_integrity() is set. Let me contemplate a bit since I already have some changes brewing in this area (T10 now permits protection information to be placed at non-logical block size intervals). -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
