Re: Improving dm-mirror as a final year project

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



nishant mungse [nishantmungse@xxxxxxxxx] wrote:
> 
>    hello all,
>    There is one doubt regarding the dm-raid1. As far as i know, in dm-raid1
>    the data is written parallellyï on all the mirrors of mirrorset and if any
>    of the mirror fails to write the data then dm-mirror adds this mirror to
>    fail list by increasing the error count in "fail mirror" function in
>    dm-raid1.
>    Actually my doubt is where this error count is decremented? i.e after
>    kcpyd or before and where exactly this error count is decremented?

There is no actual 'fail list' of mirror legs. The error_count is never
decremented. The 'error_count' is only used to tell if the mirror leg
has encountered errors. The only way to clear that counter is
re-loading the table!

See the comment:

        /*
         * error_count is used for nothing more than a
         * simple way to tell if a device has encountered
         * errors.
         */
        atomic_inc(&m->error_count);

Hope that helps,
Malahal.

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel



[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux