Hello, Ted, Neil. On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 03:41:45PM -0500, Ted Ts'o wrote: > On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 07:18:58AM +1100, NeilBrown wrote: > > > > open(O_EXCL) will fail on a block device if it is being used by anything else > > - a filesystem or a dm target or an md array or .... > > > > So if the *only* thing you want is "is this currently an active part of > > something else", then O_EXCL works since 2.6.0 (I think). > > Unfortunately, that won't distinguish between a currently active file > system, and a device which is being used by a dm target, which is what > we want to do. Hmmm... that's already possible with the existing holders symlinks, right? As Kay said in another message, I don't think we can do anything about the symlinks at this point. It already has userland users, so we'll have to maintain them and there's no reason to create something else for the same functionality. It's silly that there's no way to tell whether the device is mounted from a given block device but then again we've been working around it by reverse mapping it till now so unless there's a new requirement maybe it's okay as it is now. Ideally, it would have been nice and more fitting with the whole bd claim API if we just exported single attribute which identifies the current holder supplied at the time of claiming (just the kernel identifier in string), so that we can forward-map the exclusive opener in general instead of having to reverse-map it for everything other than md/dm. Thank you. -- tejun -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
