On Fri, Jan 14 2011 at 2:45am -0500, Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On 01/14/2011 02:09 AM, Mike Snitzer wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 17 2010 at 9:06am -0500, > > Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Dec 17 2010 at 4:47am -0500, > >> Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >>> On 11/30/2010 11:59 PM, Mike Snitzer wrote: > >>>> Hannes, > >>>> > >>>> Any chance you've had time to fold your proposed logging changes in and > >>>> rebase this patch? Could you post that updated patch? > >>>> > >>> yes, will be following shortly. > >>> > >>>> I'd like to help see this patch through to inclussion when 2.6.38 merge > >>>> window opens. I can help with further review, testing and development. > >>>> > >>> Ok, thanks. > >> > >> I took some steps at furthering your work. Here is the cover letter to > >> the patches I resently sent to dm-devel: > >> https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2010-December/msg00090.html > >> > >> And here are the patches: > >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/384612/ > >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/384602/ > >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/390882/ > >> > >> Please feel free to change these how ever you see fit but your feedback > >> is really appreciated. > > > > Hannes, > > > > Any update? I'd really like to see this work get upstream ASAP. I'm > > doubtful that is possible for 2.6.38 given the merge window is likely to > > close shortly. > > > Sorry for the late answer; the above patches somehow got lost in my > various mail folders :-( > > But yes, the patchset looks okay. > Feel free to add my Acked-by: to last two. OK. > > Regardless, if we could get consensus on this work now and then stage it > > with James that would be great. > > > Indeed. Will you resend it to linux-scsi or shall I do it? I can resend, will do so shortly. Thanks! Mike -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
