On 01/14/2011 02:09 AM, Mike Snitzer wrote: > On Fri, Dec 17 2010 at 9:06am -0500, > Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Fri, Dec 17 2010 at 4:47am -0500, >> Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> On 11/30/2010 11:59 PM, Mike Snitzer wrote: >>>> Hannes, >>>> >>>> Any chance you've had time to fold your proposed logging changes in and >>>> rebase this patch? Could you post that updated patch? >>>> >>> yes, will be following shortly. >>> >>>> I'd like to help see this patch through to inclussion when 2.6.38 merge >>>> window opens. I can help with further review, testing and development. >>>> >>> Ok, thanks. >> >> I took some steps at furthering your work. Here is the cover letter to >> the patches I resently sent to dm-devel: >> https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2010-December/msg00090.html >> >> And here are the patches: >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/384612/ >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/384602/ >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/390882/ >> >> Please feel free to change these how ever you see fit but your feedback >> is really appreciated. > > Hannes, > > Any update? I'd really like to see this work get upstream ASAP. I'm > doubtful that is possible for 2.6.38 given the merge window is likely to > close shortly. > Sorry for the late answer; the above patches somehow got lost in my various mail folders :-( But yes, the patchset looks okay. Feel free to add my Acked-by: to last two. > Regardless, if we could get consensus on this work now and then stage it > with James that would be great. > Indeed. Will you resend it to linux-scsi or shall I do it? Cheers, Hannes -- Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage hare@xxxxxxx +49 911 74053 688 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
