On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 02:37:22PM +0100, Tejun Heo wrote: > > It seems that dependencies (holders/slaves) between devices is pretty > > generic thing. Why do you think that we need claimer-specific method? > > The /sys filesystem is better that ictls in many ways. Also, one more thing. In btrfs, there's no block device for the master device. You can add the slaves directory somewhere and your choice would be as good as any other's but it just will not be generic while being superflous exactly the same way it's superflous for md and dm devices. Thanks. -- tejun -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
