Hello, On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 11:02:31PM +0000, Alasdair G Kergon wrote: > On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 08:34:58PM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 14 2010 at 6:59pm -0500, > > Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I'm concerned about switching to using the global system_wq and calling > > > flush_scheduled_work() when resuming a DM table (calls a DM target's > > > ->dtr() via dm_table_destroy in drivers/md/dm-ioctl.c:do_resume). > > Absolutely. > > I'm not taking patch 1 in its current form - it introduces a problem > that was not present before. Probably part of patch 4 needs moving > into patch 1. I can just combine 1 and 4 then or reorder them such that flush_work_sync() conversion happens first and then the dedicated wq is dropped. Which one would you prefer? Thanks. -- tejun -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
