> Not if in_interrupt is set though?
> + if (per_cpu(io_wq_cpu, cpu) == current && !in_interrupt()) {
>
> What I am missing here?
The interrupt doesn't block on the task.
Actually most likely that check isn't needed anyways because
that should not happen, was just pure paranoia from my side.
>
> (And assume there is only 1 CPU too for worst case behaviour, presumably.)
One per process, previously it was always one per CPU.
-Andi
--
ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Speaking for myself only.
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
