On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 06:01:51PM +0100, Alasdair G Kergon wrote: > On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 12:22:57PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote: > > this out quite yet. You have 4 patches yet you say conceptually there > > are 2 distinct changes. > > IOW should we end up with 2 bisectable patches here? > > And the potentially-broken/poorly-performing stacked async should be > explained in comments inline perhaps if we're choosing to ignore this > apparent regression. It's not broken AFAIK and it will not perform worse than the original single thread work queue. -Andi -- ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Speaking for myself only. -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
