Hello, On 09/01/2010 02:12 PM, Mikulas Patocka wrote: > That may be true for request-based dm (I don't know). Oh, okay, this part of thread was for request based dm, so I assumed you were talking about it. > But bio-based dm doesn't depend on it, I wrote it and I didn't rely on > that. If you look at the two patches for bio-based ones. The first one is basically what you're talking about w/ s/barrier/flush/ renames and dropping of -EOPNOTSUPP. It doesn't really change the mechanism much. If you don't feel comfortable about the second one, we sure can postpone it but it's still quite away from the next merge window and what would be the point of delaying it? Thanks. -- tejun -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
