On Wed, Sep 01 2010 at 8:42am -0400, Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hello, > > On 09/01/2010 02:12 PM, Mikulas Patocka wrote: > > That may be true for request-based dm (I don't know). > > Oh, okay, this part of thread was for request based dm, so I assumed > you were talking about it. > > > But bio-based dm doesn't depend on it, I wrote it and I didn't rely on > > that. > > If you look at the two patches for bio-based ones. The first one is > basically what you're talking about w/ s/barrier/flush/ renames and > dropping of -EOPNOTSUPP. It doesn't really change the mechanism much. > If you don't feel comfortable about the second one, we sure can > postpone it but it's still quite away from the next merge window and > what would be the point of delaying it? Right, we have a window of opportunity to sort this out now. No sense in wasting it. Mike -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
