On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 01:15:43AM -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote: > > Almost every CPU is "very slow" so that it lags behind disk when > encrypting. CPUs with hardware AES may be the exception. I would not call a platform like Nehalem the exception. > If one CPU submits I/O for 10MB of data, your patch makes no > paralelization at all. Because all those 10MB will be encrypted by the > same CPU that submitted it. He doesn't need to. This is already solved by pcrypt. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
