Le lundi 31 mai 2010 à 19:46 +0200, Andi Kleen a écrit : > On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 06:34:55PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > Yes seems like I'm behind on per cpu innovations. > > > Since commit e0fdb0e050eae331, we have a __percpu annotation so that > > sparse can be augmented. This would also make the comment unnecessary... > > I think the comment is still necessary. > > > > > > + __get_cpu_var(io_wq_cpu) = current; > > > > this_cpu_write(io_wq_cpu, current) > > And this one looks more ugly than before and does not seem > to generate better code, so I decided to skip it. This is because you whould use __this_cpu_write() in this context of course ;) generated code : one instruction -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
