RE: [PATCH 1/4] scsi_dh: Change the scsidh_activate interface to be asynchronous

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 16:04 -0600, Moger, Babu wrote:
> Chandra, I have one comment on this patch.. 
> 
> >  static inline int scsi_dh_handler_exist(const char *name)
> > Index: linux-2.6.31/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.31.orig/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh.c
> > +++ linux-2.6.31/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh.c
> > @@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ store_dh_state(struct device *dev, struc
> >  			 * Activate a device handler
> >  			 */
> >  			if (scsi_dh->activate)
> > -				err = scsi_dh->activate(sdev);
> > +				err = scsi_dh->activate(sdev, NULL, NULL);
> 
> 
> This might cause problems in handlers.  We don’t do NULL check in attach routine.

I assume you meant activate(), when you mention "attach" above.

At every place where the callback function is called, we first check
that the callback function is not NULL.

Can you point me if I missed some place.

Thanks

chandra

> 
> 
> >  			else
> >  				err = 0;
> >  		}


--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux