On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:36:22AM +0800, Gui Jianfeng wrote:
> Vivek Goyal wrote:
> ...
>
> > +
> > +static void elv_preempt_queue(struct request_queue *q, struct io_queue *ioq)
> > +{
> > + elv_log_ioq(q->elevator->efqd, ioq, "preempt");
> > + elv_slice_expired(q);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Put the new queue at the front of the of the current list,
> > + * so we know that it will be selected next.
> > + */
> > +
> > + requeue_ioq(ioq);
> > + ioq->slice_start = ioq->slice_end = 0;
>
> I think this assignment is redundant because these two members will be reset
> when this ioq is scheduled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
thanks Gui. Queued for next posting.
Vivek
> ---
> block/elevator-fq.c | 1 -
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/elevator-fq.c b/block/elevator-fq.c
> index d04e925..b3c387d 100644
> --- a/block/elevator-fq.c
> +++ b/block/elevator-fq.c
> @@ -2650,7 +2650,6 @@ static void elv_preempt_queue(struct request_queue *q, struct io_queue *ioq)
> */
>
> requeue_ioq(ioq);
> - ioq->slice_start = ioq->slice_end = 0;
> elv_mark_ioq_slice_new(ioq);
> }
> }
> --
> 1.5.4.rc3
>
>
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
