It is a question to Jens :) On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 10:13 +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > Chandra Seetharaman wrote: > > I do not know the functionality of this module. So, my comments are only > > related to code. > > > > blk_request_rq() frees up the request before it returns (in > > blk_end_sync_rq()). So, there is no need for blk_put_request(). > > > Indeed. But this opens up another question: > > By the time blk_execute_rq() returns, the request is already > put back onto the queue. > That means that I shouldn't access rq->errors any more, as > the request might have been reused already. > But blk_execute_rq() returns -EIO for any error, making it > impossible to signal a proper error here. > So how do I get the contents of rq->errors safely? > > Cheers, > > Hannes -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
