Re: Creation of the mpath# devices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Nov 15, 2007 3:29 PM, Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Which you can use to access the device. If you don't like dealing with
> such a cumbersome name, you can always add
>
>       user_friendly_names yes
>
> to the defaults section of /etc/multipath.conf
>

Hey Ben,

That worked great.  :)  I now have /dev/mapper/mpath0 (and the p1
partition that already exists) and it's now officially mounted and
working!  Is there any "best practices" about whether I should be
mounting the /dev/mapper/mpath0p1 or /dev/mpath/mpath0p1 device?

Thanks,
Scott

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux