Le mardi 19 juin 2007 à 14:25 -0700, Chandra Seetharaman a écrit : > On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 23:15 +0200, Christophe Varoqui wrote: > > Le lundi 18 juin 2007 à 17:57 -0700, Chandra Seetharaman a écrit : > > > Hi, > > > > > > Sorry about the late response. I just realized that pp_rdac has been > > > added to the multipath tree. > > > > > > pp_rdac is not needed to support lsi-rdac devices. pp_tpc performs > > > equally good. I repeated my tests with pp_tpc and they did work well. > > > > > rdac has superseded the tpc checker in the upstream tree. > > > > (A): > > This checker is currently the only one usable with LSI Engenio hardware > > integrated by either IBM or SGI. As such I don't plan on removing it > > from the tree, if it's ok with you. > > > > I am little confused here. > > Background info: > ------ > (1) When I said we do _not_ need pp_rdac, I am referring to path > priority callout code(the code I submitted on May 21st). Code under the > directory path_priority/pp_rdac. > > (2) The path checker code I submitted on March 23rd is needed to support > the LSI Engenio hardware. This code resides in libcheckers/rdac.c > ------ > > (2) is needed and I presume you are referring to that at (A) > > (1) is not needed and we can achieve the same with > path_priority/pp_tpc/mpath_prio_tpc > The confusion was on my side, thank you for pointing it. I'll get back to my homework then. -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
