On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 23:15 +0200, Christophe Varoqui wrote:
> Le lundi 18 juin 2007 à 17:57 -0700, Chandra Seetharaman a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > Sorry about the late response. I just realized that pp_rdac has been
> > added to the multipath tree.
> >
> > pp_rdac is not needed to support lsi-rdac devices. pp_tpc performs
> > equally good. I repeated my tests with pp_tpc and they did work well.
> >
> rdac has superseded the tpc checker in the upstream tree.
>
(A):
> This checker is currently the only one usable with LSI Engenio hardware
> integrated by either IBM or SGI. As such I don't plan on removing it
> from the tree, if it's ok with you.
>
I am little confused here.
Background info:
------
(1) When I said we do _not_ need pp_rdac, I am referring to path
priority callout code(the code I submitted on May 21st). Code under the
directory path_priority/pp_rdac.
(2) The path checker code I submitted on March 23rd is needed to support
the LSI Engenio hardware. This code resides in libcheckers/rdac.c
------
(2) is needed and I presume you are referring to that at (A)
(1) is not needed and we can achieve the same with
path_priority/pp_tpc/mpath_prio_tpc
> Regards,
> cvaroqui
>
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chandra Seetharaman | Be careful what you choose....
- sekharan@xxxxxxxxxx | .......you may get it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
