RE: patch to discovery.c to still get path priority forpaths with path state of PATH_DOWN

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dave,

Sorry for the confusion.

I realize that at first glance the patch may not make sense, but it
is an attempt to avoid the case of not being able to properly assign
path groups with a group_by_priority path grouping policy if any of
the paths respond successfully to scsi_id(8) and mpath_prio_* but not
their multipath path checker.  Such is the case for LUNZ and inactive
snapshot logical units on CLARiiON.

Ed

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dm-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:dm-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Dave Wysochanski
> Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 3:05 PM
> To: device-mapper development
> Cc: christophe.varoqui@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Re:  patch to discovery.c to still get 
> path priority forpaths with path state of PATH_DOWN
> 
> Ed, I am looking through your patches and in particular this change,
> which reverts a previous change I submitted a little while back.
> 
> Maybe we can do something better like clarify states.  Looking through
> the code now and will have more feedback.
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 18:01 -0500, Edward Goggin wrote:
> > --
> > dm-devel mailing list
> > dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
> 
> --
> dm-devel mailing list
> dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
> 
> 

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux