[dm-devel] Re: [PATCH] 1/1: Device-Mapper: Remove 1024 devices limitation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 10:35:52PM +0100, Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
> Yes, but the comments imply that the thing it found might in some
> circumstances not be the thing you asked it to look for 

To clarify, we make two sorts of requests for ids [minor numbers]:
  (a) What is the lowest unused id number?
  (b) Is id number N used or not?

If I interpret things correctly, in case (b) if N is larger than the
the highest id number currently stored it might still return non-NULL 
(if lower order bits match lower order bits of a different stored id).

[Would it be sufficient for the caller to keep track of the highest 
allocated ID and check before calling, or is the masking sometimes
stronger than that?]

Alasdair
-- 
agk@xxxxxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux