Qlogic shouldn't be strung out. It wasn't them.... As part of a change that went into the FC transport - the device reported under this directory was moved from the LUN device to the Target device - thus the change in name format (it killed replication of target data that was being done for all luns). The attributes underneath remain the same. I believe this change occurred in the first rc1 patch to 2.6.9. As to the grand plan - you should be fine if you : pre-2.6.10: it's the older name format "/sys/class/fc_transport/<host>:<channel>:<target>:<lun>" 2.6.10 and later : it's the new format "/sys/class/fc_transport/target<host>:<channel>:<target>" and the folks running a patched 2.6.9 have to live by the new format. -- James S. > -----Original Message----- > From: dm-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:dm-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx]On > Behalf Of christophe varoqui > Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 4:53 PM > To: device-mapper development > Cc: linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > linux-hotplug-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: [dm-devel] [ANNOUNCE] multipath-tools-0.4.1 > > > Le mercredi 22 d?embre 2004 �1:26 -0800, Caushik, Ramesh a �it : > > On my system I have a Qlogic 2310 driver running on a 2.6.9 > kernel. The fc_transport > > directory in sysfs looks like > > > > ls -ll /sys/class/fc_transport/ > > total 0 > > drwxr-xr-x 6 root root 0 Dec 16 13:59 . > > drwxr-xr-x 20 root root 0 Dec 15 14:31 .. > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Dec 16 13:59 2:0:0:0 > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Dec 16 13:59 2:0:1:0 > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Dec 16 13:59 2:0:2:0 > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Dec 16 13:59 2:0:3:0 > > > > The patch addresses only this format. So please disregard > the patch, and sorry about the confusion. > > > ... > > [root@cl039 multipath]# ll /sys/class/fc_transport/ > > total 0 > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Dec 14 16:26 target2:0:0 > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Dec 14 16:26 target2:0:1 > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Dec 14 16:26 target2:0:2 > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Dec 14 16:27 target2:0:3 > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Dec 14 16:27 target3:0:0 > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Dec 14 16:27 target3:0:1 > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Dec 14 16:27 target3:0:2 > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Dec 14 16:27 target3:0:3 > > > Can someone, maybe from Qlogic, comment on these differences ? > Is there a grant unified plan for driver objects > representation through > sysfs, and if so which is the right path name to fetch the node_name. > > regards, > -- > christophe varoqui <christophe.varoqui@xxxxxxx> > > > -- > > dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel >
