One more addition to the 2.4.21 (and probably 2.4.22 also) patch. The
dm-ioctl.h file provided in the patch doesn't include the definition for
"DM_LIST_VERSIONS", and the library won't compile without it. I'm surprised
this hasn't been caught -- I can't believe that anyone could have compiled
successfully after modifying the kernel with these patches. Why is 1.00.08
considered the stable release for 2.4 kernels?
-Brian
--- linux-2.4.21/include/linux/dm-ioctl.h Mon Apr 5 16:02:20 2004
+++ linux/include/linux/dm-ioctl.h Tue Apr 6 15:17:12 2004
@@ -185,6 +185,8 @@
DM_TABLE_CLEAR_CMD,
DM_TABLE_DEPS_CMD,
DM_TABLE_STATUS_CMD,
+
+ DM_LIST_VERSIONS_CMD,
};
#define DM_IOCTL 0xfd
@@ -192,6 +194,7 @@
#define DM_VERSION _IOWR(DM_IOCTL, DM_VERSION_CMD, struct dm_ioctl)
#define DM_REMOVE_ALL _IOWR(DM_IOCTL, DM_REMOVE_ALL_CMD, struct dm_ioctl)
#define DM_LIST_DEVICES _IOWR(DM_IOCTL, DM_LIST_DEVICES_CMD, struct dm_ioctl)
+#define DM_LIST_VERSIONS _IOWR(DM_IOCTL, DM_LIST_VERSIONS_CMD, struct dm_ioctl)
#define DM_DEV_CREATE _IOWR(DM_IOCTL, DM_DEV_CREATE_CMD, struct dm_ioctl)
#define DM_DEV_REMOVE _IOWR(DM_IOCTL, DM_DEV_REMOVE_CMD, struct dm_ioctl)
