On Sat, 2019-06-29 at 19:03 +0200, Milan Broz wrote: > - other AEGIS variants (AEGIS256, AEGIS128L) are ok, > but the consensus seems to be to support only one finalist > variant (AEGIS128) That's a bit surprising... shouldn't AEGIS256 have a higher security goal, according to the design paper? So why removing it? Cheers, Chris. _______________________________________________ dm-crypt mailing list dm-crypt@xxxxxxxx https://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt
