On 18 Jun 2017 08:49 +0200, from julio.gago@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Julio Gago): > cryptsetup luksFormat --cipher aes-xts /dev/sdc > cryptsetup luksOpen /dev/sdc sdc > fdisk /dev/mapper/sdc > (created partitions manually) > mkfs.ext4 /dev/mapper/sdc1 > mkfs.ext4 /dev/mapper/sdc2 > mount /dev/mapper/sdc1 /part1_dmcrypt > mount /dev/mapper/sdc2 /part2_dmcrypt What you have done here is to sub-partition a LUKS container using MBR partitions. You can do that, _technically_ (as you have found out), but I dare say that it's not a typical setup. You are therefore likely to run into edge cases that have seen relatively little testing, and some things that might just be plain difficult to get to work reliably. I suspect that what you are seeing here is more the latter than the former. A typical setup would more likely be to partition the disk, then set up a separate LUKS container (possibly with derived keys, which would allow you to open all LUKS containers by opening just one) on each partition. An alternative typical setup would be to create a LUKS container over the whole disk and use that container as a single file system, with no partitioning (in the sense of MBR or GPT) involved. If you have your heart set on sub-partitioning the LUKS container (in order to conceal the fact that the LUKS container is divided into distinct portions), I suppose you could create a LVM container within the LUKS container, then create logical volumes within the LVM container, then file systems on those, for an end result of something like: Physical storage LUKS LVM LV FS LV FS LV FS ... That would probably have better chances of working reliably than what you have now. You'd open the LUKS container, then import the LVM container, which will import the LVs within it and make the file systems within those available for mounting. The LVM metadata would be encrypted on disk by virtue of the LVM container existing fully within the LUKS container, so the data security properties should be very similar to those you'd get with your proposed partitions-within-LUKS scheme. -- Michael Kjörling • https://michael.kjorling.se • michael@xxxxxxxxxxx “People who think they know everything really annoy those of us who know we don’t.” (Bjarne Stroustrup) _______________________________________________ dm-crypt mailing list dm-crypt@xxxxxxxx http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt