On 02/10/2016 07:48 AM, Sven Eschenberg wrote:
BTW: Personally I think that one thing in the blockdevice stack was screwed up severely: Always have information on the upper layer in the lower layer - That would eliminate most issues. On the lowest layer we do have that information (PARTUUID/PARTTYPE), it is just mostly ignored.
It's good that it's ignored. If anything stopped working just because I moved a LUKS container to a different partition or device, I would get rid of LUKS immediately and just use plain dm-crypt. Adding unnecessary inter-relationships is a _bad_ thing. -- Bob Nichols "NOSPAM" is really part of my email address. Do NOT delete it. _______________________________________________ dm-crypt mailing list dm-crypt@xxxxxxxx http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt