On 02/10/2016 07:48 AM, Sven Eschenberg wrote:
BTW: Personally I think that one thing in the blockdevice stack was
screwed up severely: Always have information on the upper layer in the
lower layer - That would eliminate most issues. On the lowest layer we
do have that information (PARTUUID/PARTTYPE), it is just mostly ignored.
It's good that it's ignored. If anything stopped working just because
I moved a LUKS container to a different partition or device, I would
get rid of LUKS immediately and just use plain dm-crypt. Adding
unnecessary inter-relationships is a _bad_ thing.
--
Bob Nichols "NOSPAM" is really part of my email address.
Do NOT delete it.
_______________________________________________
dm-crypt mailing list
dm-crypt@xxxxxxxx
http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt
