Re: The future of disk encryption with LUKS2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/10/2016 07:48 AM, Sven Eschenberg wrote:
BTW: Personally I think that one thing in the blockdevice stack was
screwed up severely: Always have information on the upper layer in the
lower layer - That would eliminate most issues. On the lowest layer we
do have that information (PARTUUID/PARTTYPE), it is just mostly ignored.

It's good that it's ignored.  If anything stopped working just because
I moved a LUKS container to a different partition or device, I would
get rid of LUKS immediately and just use plain dm-crypt.  Adding
unnecessary inter-relationships is a _bad_ thing.

--
Bob Nichols     "NOSPAM" is really part of my email address.
                Do NOT delete it.

_______________________________________________
dm-crypt mailing list
dm-crypt@xxxxxxxx
http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt



[Index of Archives]     [Device Mapper Devel]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux