Re: The future of disk encryption with LUKS2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 20:49:59 CET, f-dm-c@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>     > Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 17:48:22 +0100
>     > From: Arno Wagner <arno@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
>     > I like the end, because it is clear and far away. It is also what
>     > md-RAID for superblock 0.90 does.
> 
> Doesn't that increase the chances of mdraid 0.90 stepping on your own
> "far away" header?

Not really. Or rather the 1.x formats also do beginning 
and 4k from beginning, so there is no way avoiding the 
risk anyways.

Regards,
Arno
 
-- 
Arno Wagner,     Dr. sc. techn., Dipl. Inform.,    Email: arno@xxxxxxxxxxx
GnuPG: ID: CB5D9718  FP: 12D6 C03B 1B30 33BB 13CF  B774 E35C 5FA1 CB5D 9718
----
A good decision is based on knowledge and not on numbers. -- Plato

If it's in the news, don't worry about it.  The very definition of 
"news" is "something that hardly ever happens." -- Bruce Schneier
_______________________________________________
dm-crypt mailing list
dm-crypt@xxxxxxxx
http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt



[Index of Archives]     [Device Mapper Devel]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux