Am 17.02.2014 15:39, schrieb Arno Wagner: > That this is in a c-file, not an easily changed shell- > skript, already explains quite a bit of what is wrong > with systemd. Besides the fact that this is completely off-topic: You could use the same argument on cryptsetup and claim that it should be a shell script. Why isn't it? If I want 'cryptsetup luksOpen's prompt to change, I need to change it in cryptsetup and recompile. If it was a script, I could easily edit it. It's *precisely* your argument. (Of course, it completely ignores that the next system update would overwrite it, shell script or binary). Really, please stop inventing weird arguments against things that you don't use, are not interested in and don't know anything about - and keep it on-topic. > Pity. With a sane init system, it would just be a change to > some shell-skript, i.e. 2 minutes with a text editor. Until the next system update - and then you edit it again. System maintenance like it is done in 2014!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ dm-crypt mailing list dm-crypt@xxxxxxxx http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt
