On 16.01.2014 20:33, Milan Broz wrote: > > But I cannot say that all possible situations comes under this qualification. > Maybe it can help someone in dangerous situation to not leak some important data > which later help others. Dunno. > > Still it doesn't mean it is worth to be implemented but let's think > at least twice here please. Meanwhile increasing the risk of everybody else, because once that feature is a documented part of the system everybody will assume that everybody will use it. Good look defending against a "Destruction of Evidence" accusation, in case that happens in a situation with a LEO. Same as the hidden volume "feature" of Truecypt which everybody will assume you use, because it's such a swell feature. (Plausible deniabilty? Yeah sure <snort>) In short: The documented existence of such a feature is a risk by itself. -- Matthias _______________________________________________ dm-crypt mailing list dm-crypt@xxxxxxxx http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt
