On 11/12/2013 08:10 AM, Milan Broz wrote: > On 11/12/2013 03:58 PM, Matthew Monaco wrote: >> It didn't make sense to me to do it using libcryptsetup because the bottleneck >> was the actual decryption attempt. > > The example I posted link to is using common context and arbitrary number > of processes (default is number of CPU cores) which run in parallel > (hash iterations can easily run in parallel on different CPUs) > So every process tries n-th line in candidate password file. > > This is the advantage (plus save some negligible initialization time), > otherwise script is fine of course. > I read up from his message and missed your link. I'll keep that handy =) It's not that I have a horrible memory, I just occasionally don't use a volume for many months or even years at a time. _______________________________________________ dm-crypt mailing list dm-crypt@xxxxxxxx http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt
