Re: Bad performance with software RAID5 and LUKS encryption

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Philipp,

thanks, if that explains it reasonably well, I will just
paraphrase. But first I have to understand it myself ;-)

Arno

On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 10:09:36PM +0100, Philipp Wendler wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Am 05.02.2013 21:45, schrieb Arno Wagner:
> > thanks for the info. I think I may add a "performance"
> > section to the FAQ, and this could be one of the items.
> > Do you have the reference where you found the info on the
> > stripe_cache_size?
> 
> Actually, I first read about the concept of a stripe cache in this btrfs
> announcement post:
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/23006
> Then I googled it and found some usages:
> http://h3x.no/2011/07/09/tuning-ubuntu-mdadm-raid56
> http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1494846
> 
> Unfortunately, I didn't find a real citable source.
> The kernel documentation (Documentation/md.txt) also only contains 3
> lines saying nothing about what it actually is.
> 
> Greetings, Philipp
> 
> 
> > On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 09:02:21PM +0100, Philipp Wendler wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Am 05.07.2011 08:45, schrieb Philipp Wendler:
> >>> I have set up a Linux software RAID5 on three hard drives and want to
> >>> encrypt it with cryptsetup/LUKS. My tests showed that the encryption
> >>> leads to a massive performance decrease that I cannot explain.
> >>>
> >>> The RAID5 is able to write 187 MB/s [1] without encryption. With
> >>> encryption on top of it, write speed is down to about 40 MB/s.
> >>
> >> Sorry for answering to a mail in this very old thread,
> >> but it seems I finally found a solution,
> >> and I know that there are some other people interested in the solution
> >> as well (so if you got this email directly from me, I BCC'ed you because
> >> you contacted me about this).
> >> If you want to read up the full story, here's the link:
> >> http://www.saout.de/pipermail/dm-crypt/2011-July/001773.html
> >>
> >> Today I read about the stripe_cache_size setting of md RAID, and tried
> >> it out. With the default value of 256, the performance is slow as
> >> described. With a value of 4096, I get a performance increase from about
> >> 40-50 MB/s to 123 MB/s. For values >= 8192, I get 140 MB/s out of it.
> >>
> >> Background: The stripe cache stores recently written blocks. If data is
> >> written continuously, it might happen that during a first write only a
> >> part of one stripe is written. This means, the RAID code has to read the
> >> complete stripe from disk, update it, and write it completely again. If
> >> a second write comes in for another part of the same stripe, all this
> >> would have to be done again. Now, if the cache is used and still
> >> contains the data written by the first write, the read that was
> >> necessary before the second write can be omitted.
> >>
> >>
> >> Now it seems that dm-crypt always writes with small block size to the
> >> underlying disk, even when I write with a big block size.
> >> Could this be true?
> >> Could this perhaps be improved? While I have found a solution for me,
> >> this could probably solve performance problems for many people.
> >>
> >> Furthermore, dm-crypt write is still slower than unencrypted write,
> >> although for reads the performance of encrypted and unencrypted are the
> >> same. So I guess the small block size still has a performance penalty
> >> (probably when first writing to a stripe and it is not yet in cache).
> >>
> >> My current setup is Ubuntu 12.04 (Linux 3.2).
> >> Nothing else has changed compared to when I first asked about this.
> >>
> >> Greetings, Philipp
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> dm-crypt mailing list
> >> dm-crypt@xxxxxxxx
> >> http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dm-crypt mailing list
> dm-crypt@xxxxxxxx
> http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt

-- 
Arno Wagner,     Dr. sc. techn., Dipl. Inform.,    Email: arno@xxxxxxxxxxx
GnuPG: ID: CB5D9718  FP: 12D6 C03B 1B30 33BB 13CF  B774 E35C 5FA1 CB5D 9718
----
One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty
are stupid, and those with any imagination and understanding are filled
with doubt and indecision. -- Bertrand Russell
_______________________________________________
dm-crypt mailing list
dm-crypt@xxxxxxxx
http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt


[Index of Archives]     [Device Mapper Devel]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux