On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:44:34AM -0800, Dinesh Garg wrote: > >>Please can you be more specific? > I was offering my help in term of code change and testing and upstreaming > the patch. You need to establish a clear and valuable use-case first. I still do not see it. > > Which HW accelerator you are using, where is the source of it and > > when it will be part of upstream kernel? (if not already). > I would not like to disclose the HW accelerator details. However, IMO, > anyone who changes GPL license based code, has to opensource the changes. Well, maybe you have noticed that FOSS projects tend to be not very friendly to closed hardware and even less so to secret hardware. I guess you have to fight through this on your own. If you actually have links to the developers of said hardware, you may tell them that by having long key change times, they messed up. Arno -- Arno Wagner, Dr. sc. techn., Dipl. Inform., Email: arno@xxxxxxxxxxx GnuPG: ID: CB5D9718 FP: 12D6 C03B 1B30 33BB 13CF B774 E35C 5FA1 CB5D 9718 ---- One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid, and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision. -- Bertrand Russell _______________________________________________ dm-crypt mailing list dm-crypt@xxxxxxxx http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt
