On 01.09.2011, Shardis wrote: > Personally, I tend to find that the only sane technical reason not to encrypt anything considered > sensitive these days is CPU cycle cost. "Security is essentially a trade-off" (B. Schneier). If the data is worth the encryption, you'll have to live with cpu overhead. If it's not: why do you want to have it encrypted, then? > Why would you ever NOT want to encrypt in house? Because the data isn't worth it? _______________________________________________ dm-crypt mailing list dm-crypt@xxxxxxxx http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt
