Re: The weird bug again: semid XXXXXX: semop failed for cookie 0xdeadbeef: incorrect semaphore state

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On jeu., 2011-08-18 at 10:56 +0200, Milan Broz wrote:
> >> Despite I like the idea of sandboxing I have to ask
> >> why it is part of "browser" and not some separate package.
> >> What's next? Bundled kernel? :)
> > 
> > Because each tab is sandboxed. There's a seccomp sandbox available too.
> 
> It doesn't mean it should install trillion of bundled libraries.
> (Not that other browsers are much bettter...) 

Though that's quite unrelated. But they intend to provide a seccomp
sandbox library at one point, see
http://code.google.com/p/seccompsandbox/

Regards,
-- 
Yves-Alexis

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
dm-crypt mailing list
dm-crypt@xxxxxxxx
http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt

[Index of Archives]     [Device Mapper Devel]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux