Re: The weird bug again: semid XXXXXX: semop failed for cookie 0xdeadbeef: incorrect semaphore state

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/17/2011 12:48 PM, Milan Broz wrote:
>> For chromium, it might be that the default sandboxing (setuid one) uses
>> PID and network namespaces. Not sure why it'd mess with semaphores, but
>> maybe there's something to look at there.

It is apparently related to sandboxing, namely to using namespaces
(You need kernel support for it to reproduce. See about:sandbox in chromium.)

I would really like to know what crazy is chromium doing to global
system.

Despite I like the idea of sandboxing I have to ask
why it is part of "browser" and not some separate package.
What's next? Bundled kernel? :)

Also installing setuid /usr/lib64/chromium/chromium-sandbox ...
Not even man page for it. Sigh...

Milan
_______________________________________________
dm-crypt mailing list
dm-crypt@xxxxxxxx
http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt


[Index of Archives]     [Device Mapper Devel]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux