Re: LUKS and LVM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 09:46:04AM -0700, Nicolas Bock wrote:
> 
> 
> On 02/18/11 13:07, Arno Wagner wrote:
> > (I use plain dm-crypt
> >>> with a random password and overwrite with conventional,
> >>> mt19997-generated randomness).
> 
> 
> Why use random data to overwrite? Shouldn't /dev/zero be enough since
> the crypto should produce good randomness on disk?

It is only marginally slower this way and there may be issues
with initialisation vectors in disk encryption. There are
no that I know of with the current cryptsetup defaults. This
is just a very cheap additional layer of protection.

Arno

-- 
Arno Wagner, Dr. sc. techn., Dipl. Inform., CISSP -- Email: arno@xxxxxxxxxxx 
GnuPG:  ID: 1E25338F  FP: 0C30 5782 9D93 F785 E79C  0296 797F 6B50 1E25 338F
----
Cuddly UI's are the manifestation of wishful thinking. -- Dylan Evans

If it's in the news, don't worry about it.  The very definition of 
"news" is "something that hardly ever happens." -- Bruce Schneier 
_______________________________________________
dm-crypt mailing list
dm-crypt@xxxxxxxx
http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt


[Index of Archives]     [Device Mapper Devel]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux