I am currently assisting the OP offline. Seems the LUKS header was overwritten in some fashion. Arno On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 04:39:23PM +0200, Heinz Diehl wrote: > On 27.10.2010, ts0@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > after rebooting i wasn?t able to unlock the luks-partition. > > the luks header is there. the kernel configuration hasn?t changed > > (all ciphers are integrated). the passphrase is valid but not > > accepted. > > A shot in the dark: do you use the same keymapping when you're entering > the passphrase as you did while LUKS-formatting the drive? > > _______________________________________________ > dm-crypt mailing list > dm-crypt@xxxxxxxx > http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt > -- Arno Wagner, Dr. sc. techn., Dipl. Inform., CISSP -- Email: arno@xxxxxxxxxxx GnuPG: ID: 1E25338F FP: 0C30 5782 9D93 F785 E79C 0296 797F 6B50 1E25 338F ---- Cuddly UI's are the manifestation of wishful thinking. -- Dylan Evans If it's in the news, don't worry about it. The very definition of "news" is "something that hardly ever happens." -- Bruce Schneier _______________________________________________ dm-crypt mailing list dm-crypt@xxxxxxxx http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt