Re: valid passphrase not accepted

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I am currently assisting the OP offline. Seems the LUKS
header was overwritten in some fashion.

Arno

On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 04:39:23PM +0200, Heinz Diehl wrote:
> On 27.10.2010, ts0@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: 
> 
> > after rebooting i wasn?t able to unlock the luks-partition.
> > the luks header is there. the kernel configuration hasn?t changed
> > (all ciphers are integrated). the passphrase is valid but not
> > accepted.
> 
> A shot in the dark: do you use the same keymapping when you're entering
> the passphrase as you did while LUKS-formatting the drive?
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dm-crypt mailing list
> dm-crypt@xxxxxxxx
> http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt
> 

-- 
Arno Wagner, Dr. sc. techn., Dipl. Inform., CISSP -- Email: arno@xxxxxxxxxxx 
GnuPG:  ID: 1E25338F  FP: 0C30 5782 9D93 F785 E79C  0296 797F 6B50 1E25 338F
----
Cuddly UI's are the manifestation of wishful thinking. -- Dylan Evans

If it's in the news, don't worry about it.  The very definition of 
"news" is "something that hardly ever happens." -- Bruce Schneier 
_______________________________________________
dm-crypt mailing list
dm-crypt@xxxxxxxx
http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt


[Index of Archives]     [Device Mapper Devel]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux