Arno Wagner <arno@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Well, if the attacker mirrors your network traffic with iSCSI, > encryption does not matter anymore for any change analysis. > But using such a set-up wpuld be pretty stupid anayways.... ;-) Why? Do you have better ideas how to circumvent trusting your remote Backup Provider than encrypting everything before sending it away? Encrypted block-devices via iSCSI, AoE, or NBD are some of the more comfortable solutions I'm thinking about when it comes to efficient remote multi-generation backups (using rsnapshot on top, for example). regards Mario -- Why did the tachyon cross the road? Because it was on the other side. _______________________________________________ dm-crypt mailing list dm-crypt@xxxxxxxx http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt
