Bummers, I really though I hit something somewhat new. Whoever said you cannot teach old dogs new tricks was wrong. I really did not imagine this one goes back this far. Anyways, is there any hope, we can fix this? I am happy to provide whatever it needs to fix this one ... Regards -Sven (P.S. I feel kinda stuck right here...) On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 00:00 +0200, Arno Wagner wrote: > Ooooh, some interference between gcc and the hardening. > And here I was expecting some nice, obscure algorithmic > problem... > > But reported in 2007? I have to agree there seems to be > an issue with propagatong bugs from Gentoo. > > Arno > > > > On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 11:40:51PM +0200, Milan Broz wrote: > > > > > > On 07/07/2010 10:58 PM, Sven Eschenberg wrote: > > > For starters, I'll select the easiest case, plain luksFormat without > > > special params: > > > > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283470 > > > > (maybe someone form Gentoo can send such bugs upstream? > > it is there for so long time...) > > > > Milan > > _______________________________________________ > > dm-crypt mailing list > > dm-crypt@xxxxxxxx > > http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt > > > _______________________________________________ dm-crypt mailing list dm-crypt@xxxxxxxx http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt
