On 06.08.2009, Henrik Theiling wrote: > Fascinating. I thought Serpent was universally the slowest of the > three big algorithms (AES/Rijndael, Twofish, Serpent) that was used if > you wanted highest security margins. Your speed test results come > quite unexpected for me... The question is: how has this been measured, and is it faster on both read and write operations? E.g. a simple "hdparm -tT /dev/xxx" is not sufficient. How about a bonnie++ run, e.g. something like "bonnie++ -u htd:users -d /mnt/test -s 16016m -m liesel -n 16:100000:16:6" _______________________________________________ dm-crypt mailing list dm-crypt@xxxxxxxx http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt
