Re: 2.6.28.2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 02:26:13PM +0100, Heinz Diehl wrote:
> 
>> No. My rates are totally stable with 2.6.28.2 and at the same level as
>> they were running any 2.6.28.x so far.
> 
> 2.6.28.x vanilla, forgot to mention it, sorry!
> 

Ok, I'm running vanilla + grsecurity. Forgot to mention that it's LUKS.

some numbers on a LUKS raid0:

hdparm -tT
 Timing cached reads:   1246 MB in  2.00 seconds = 622.90 MB/sec
 Timing buffered disk reads:  122 MB in  3.01 seconds =  40.51 MB/sec

hdparm -tT --direct
 Timing O_DIRECT cached reads:    70 MB in  2.04 seconds =  34.26 MB/sec
 Timing O_DIRECT disk reads:  104 MB in  3.04 seconds =  34.26 MB/sec

hdparm -tT (on unencrypted device)
 Timing cached reads:   1486 MB in  2.00 seconds = 743.18 MB/sec
 Timing buffered disk reads:  530 MB in  3.00 seconds = 176.59 MB/sec

hdparm -tT --direct (on unencrypted device)
 Timing O_DIRECT cached reads:   232 MB in  2.01 seconds = 115.40 MB/sec
 Timing O_DIRECT disk reads:  476 MB in  3.01 seconds = 158.36 MB/sec

Pretty bad slowdown with encryption, hw is amd x2 4200+, 1gb ram.

/Andreas

---------------------------------------------------------------------
dm-crypt mailing list - http://www.saout.de/misc/dm-crypt/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dm-crypt-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: dm-crypt-help@xxxxxxxx


[Index of Archives]     [Device Mapper Devel]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux