Vous m'avez dit récemment : > 2008/2/20, Mathieu SEGAUD <mathieu.segaud@xxxxxxxxx>: >> Vous m'avez dit récemment : >> >> > I think i am, yes, but I'm not sure >> >> try grep aes in output from lsmod, you'll see aes_x86_64 if so. > > Ok, I'm not having the x86_64 module, only aes. > Anyone knows howto change that on debian? ;) I never built an own > kernel before and i dont want to. Can i unload the normal aes module > and load the x86_64 one some way? if some block device uses it, you can't. >> > Another thing: I just bought a phenom 9600, but now, only 2 processes >> > utilize 2 cores (/2 and /3), so it's not faster - why aren't /0 and /1 >> > using the other 2 cores? >> >> nah ? Kernel threads are bound to cpus so /0 and /1 run on the first >> cores. >> do you mean they are not running ? this should mean thay are not >> needed to complete workqueue works. > > They are running, but don't utilize cpu. so 2 are @ 100%, the other 2 > @ 0%. So i could read/write with double speed if the other 2 would > work, too - why don't they? no, you do not get it. if they are not running, it is because they would not do any good. using the C imlementation of aes must considerably limit throughput; if no data is to be processed the workqueues do not run. the fact is that using the C iplementation of aes deprives these queues which do have anything to do or not too much. -- Mathieu --------------------------------------------------------------------- dm-crypt mailing list - http://www.saout.de/misc/dm-crypt/ To unsubscribe, e-mail: dm-crypt-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: dm-crypt-help@xxxxxxxx
