Re: Cheaper encryption?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2008/2/20, Mathieu SEGAUD <mathieu.segaud@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Vous m'avez dit récemment :
>
> > I think i am, yes, but I'm not sure
>
> try grep aes in output from lsmod, you'll see aes_x86_64 if so.

Ok, I'm not having the x86_64 module, only aes.
Anyone knows howto change that on debian? ;) I never built an own
kernel before and i dont want to. Can i unload the normal aes module
and load the x86_64 one some way?

> > Another thing: I just bought a phenom 9600, but now, only 2 processes
> > utilize 2 cores (/2 and /3), so it's not faster - why aren't /0 and /1
> > using the other 2 cores?
>
> nah ? Kernel threads are bound to cpus so /0 and /1 run on the first
> cores.
> do you mean they are not running ? this should mean thay are not
> needed to complete workqueue works.

They are running, but don't utilize cpu. so 2 are @ 100%, the other 2
@ 0%. So i could read/write with double speed if the other 2 would
work, too - why don't they?

morphium

---------------------------------------------------------------------
dm-crypt mailing list - http://www.saout.de/misc/dm-crypt/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dm-crypt-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: dm-crypt-help@xxxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Device Mapper Devel]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux