Re: Re: LRW weakness?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 11:07:22PM +0100, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
> Uwe Hermann wrote:
> >On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 08:26:52AM +0100, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
> >>german linux magazin has an editorial about a potential weakness in LRW
> >>depending on how it is used. can anyone post the details about it?
> >>how do I need to use it to be secure?
> >
> >As far as I know dm-crypt/cryptsetup doesn't use LRW at all, so this is
> >not an issue anyways(?)
> 
> lrw was added to kernel 2.6.20. so now I should be able to use "aes-lrw"
> everywhere I used "aes-plain" or "aes-essiv" as far as I know.
> But I haven't found documentation so far - e.g. how to pass the tweak
> key to the kernel.

You need to pass aes-lrw-benbi as cipher mode (as said in Kconfig). You
should get LRW-32-AES encryption that way (as defined in
http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/1619/email/pdf00017.pdf)
(benbi is a lot like plain, but plain is a little endian sector (512
bytes) count, and benbi is a bigendian cipherblock count).

LRW is no IEEE1619 candidate anymore because it is very weak if you
encrypt the encryption key itself, see:
http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/1619/email/msg01150.html

Greetings,

Rik.

-- 
Nothing is ever a total loss; it can always serve as a bad example.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
dm-crypt mailing list - http://www.saout.de/misc/dm-crypt/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dm-crypt-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: dm-crypt-help@xxxxxxxx


[Index of Archives]     [Device Mapper Devel]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux