Re: [PATCH v6 04/22] of: add function to allow probing a device from a OF node

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Friday, October 23, 2015 08:54:19 AM Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> --7cm2iqirTL37Ot+N
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
> 
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 03:03:37PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> > On 22 October 2015 at 03:06, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > > Same question as from Greg: How does a subsystem know whether or not to use
> > > this function?
> 
> > Maybe I don't understand the comment, but as the commit message says,
> > subsystems can use this when looking up resources for drivers. Or you
> > mean that this information should be in the API docs?
> 
> I'm pretty sure what he's suggesting here is changing to "should always"
> (ie, explain the situations when a subsystem would do this, including
> decision criteria if it's optional).

Right.

Thanks,
Rafael

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux